iStarmedia Internet Solutions  - The Competitive Edge! - Website services for your business... Design... Marketing... e-Commerce... click here!

Click here to buy movie posters!

San Jose,
Costa Rica

Full Weather




Subscribe to USA TODAY and get a FREE Atlas


Top Stories
Full News index

Special Reports
Full Special Reports index

The Internet
Full Internet index

Villalobos Update
Full Villalobos index

Columnists

Business
Full Business index

Health

Entertainment

Ero-Tica

Subscribe to
our Mailing List!




cover
Costa Rica Books
Great books on Costa Rica at Amazon.com

Travel
Full Travel index

Real Estate
Buying and Selling
Real Estate in CR

Retirement
Full Retirement index



Editorials

Letters

Public Forum


Contact InsideCR
We love to hear from our readers

About InsideCR
Costa Rica's Other Voice


Classifieds
Online Classifieds
Place a classified ad online

Personals

Learn Spanish


Advertising
Display advertising information

Employment
Job opportunities at
Inside Costa Rica

Business Cards


Crosswords
Horoscope
Comics

 

Search Costa Rica

Rent a Car in Europe

 


 

 

 SPECIAL REPORTS: BRAZIL
Saturday 6 September 2003

 

Brazil Imports Generic AIDS Drugs from India, China

Mario Osava*



RIO DE JANEIRO, (IPS) - Brazil's decision to import generic HIV/AIDS drugs, manufactured in China and India, has gained greater legitimacy with the related agreement approved by the World Trade Organization last week, but the import policy was never contingent on international consent.

Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, issued a decree Friday that authorises importation of generic medications -- drugs identified by their main active ingredient, and usually much cheaper than their trademarked equivalents -- even without the consent of the holders of the corresponding patents.

The 146 WTO member states agreed Aug. 30 that developing countries can import generic versions of patented medications in order to tackle serious and epidemic diseases, like HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.

That accord was achieved despite criticisms from some nations of the developing world -- notably Argentina and Philippines -- that the negotiations were rushed as a means to allay fears of broad failure of the trade liberalisation talks at the WTO's Fifth Ministerial Conference, to take place in the Mexican resort city of Cancun, Sep. 10-14.

But in India, Abhay Shukla, coordinator of the Mumbai-based People's Health Movement, said, "The change in WTO rules to respond to public health emergencies... will certainly help India's pharmaceutical industry, which is strong on generic drugs and is a major player in the export trade."

Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) specialising in humanitarian issues, like Oxfam International and Doctors Without Borders, say the WTO's generic drugs agreement still favours the big pharmaceutical transnationals based in industrialised countries. Its rules say that these medications can only be used in the countries authorised to import them, and only in the quantity stipulated.

However, Alexandre Granjeiro, coordinator of the HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted disease programme at the Brazilian health ministry, says the NGOs made a "strategic error" in making "an erroneous assessment of the moment."

The low-cost drugs agreement "is a major victory" and benefits all countries that face health crises, especially in Africa, where millions of lives are lost each year to AIDS, malaria and other epidemics, Granjeiro said in an IPS interview.

The control measures, which prohibit re-exportation, do not mitigate the positive consequences of this accord for public health, he said.

Most nations do not manufacture their own medicines, due to lack of industrial capacity or the limited size of their domestic markets.

If these countries cannot import inexpensive drugs, then the principle that public health prevails over intellectual property -- approved in Doha, Qatar, by the WTO Fourth Ministerial Conference in 2001 -- is meaningless, said the health official.

Brazil's foreign minister, Celso Amorim, applauded the accord because it reduces the cost of medicines that are often purchased by the government to distribute to those in need through health programmes, free of charge.

Brazil has been one of the countries at the forefront of generic medications use as a means to handle health emergencies.

The South American giant has done so through "compulsory licensing", which allows a government to temporarily override a patent so that AIDS-fighting drugs -- antiretrovirals -- can be produced domestically. However, costs are incurred because the pharmaceutical company that holds the patent must be paid royalties.

These medications are distributed in Brazil free through an internationally recognised programme that currently attends to some 130,000 people with HIV/AIDS, costing some 195 million dollars a year.

The government's purchase of just three antiretrovirals, whose generic names are efavirenz, lopinavir and nelfinavir, absorbed 63 percent of the programme's budget. As such, Brasilia sought price reductions of at least 40 percent in negotiations with the transnational drugs labs Merck, Abbott and Roche.

The response from "big pharma" was a maximum reduction of 6.7 percent, which prompted the Brazilian government to apply the compulsory licensing measure, as laid out in its national laws, and begin importing the three AIDS drugs in their generic forms.

This is why there was no need for new WTO rules, Granjeiro explained. India and China have not yet signed on to the international patents protection system, and they produce at very low cost the generic AIDS drugs, which they can freely export until 2005.

Even so, the agreement reached last week by the WTO members lends "greater legitimacy" to Brazil's policy, he said.

The imports are necessary for now, because it will be another year before Brazil is able to manufacture the three antiretrovirals at home. When it does, it will reduce the current costs of these drugs by half, estimates Granjeiro.

But even in India, where the drugs are manufactured, access is limited, as 40 percent of the population of one billion lives below the poverty line, notes physician and health activist Shukla.

Like Brazil, "The Indian government will have to step in and subsidise the cost of drugs so that they are within the reach of the poor," he said.

Brazil has 18 state-run laboratories with the capacity to produce surplus quantities of generic drugs, "but their vocation is to attend to the needs of the domestic population, not commercial demands," Carlos Alberto Gomes, head of the Association of Official Pharmaceutical Laboratories (ALFOB), told IPS.

These labs, most of which are tied to universities or research centres, respond to requests from the Health Ministry and from state and municipal governments. Gomes does not rule out the possibility of future exports under the auspices of government accords to help other countries fight epidemics.

Brazil's pharmaceutical industry saw rapid development in the past five years, kick-started by a government policy to distribute HIV/AIDS drugs and foment the use of generics, and promote national production, says Pedro Rolim Neto, technical director of the Pernambuco state laboratory, LAFEPE, in the country's northeast.

In addition to technological modernisation, it has helped reinforce human resources in the area, Rolim, professor at the Federal University of Pernambuco, told IPS.

LAFEPE produces medications to treat tuberculosis, hypertension, diabetes, cholera and hanseniasis (leprosy), as well as the three antiretroviral drugs.

The AIDS crisis has played a key role in this process, says ALFOB chief Gomes. It forced the country to use creativity to overcome financial difficulties, and pursue initiatives that turned Brazil into a "public policy designer" to be emulated by other countries.

And it made the country a leader, alongside India, in the movement challenging pharmaceutical patents, particularly in the case of public health emergencies in the developing world, he said.

The next step for India, says Shukla, is for the government to "heavily subsidise drugs or even distribute antiretrovirals free of cost," using the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) to check the spread HIV.

Shukla pointed out that so far the World Bank-funded NACO has contented itself with its HIV/AIDS testing programmes and has yet to address the question of treatment, despite India's growing AIDS epidemic.

(* With reporting by Ranjit Devraj from India.)

 

Email this page to a Friend 

Home / News / Contact UsSubscribe / Advertise / Privacy Policy

Copyright © Insidecostarica.com. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Design & Hosting by: iStarmedia Internet Solutions